政府是否应该为削减国家负债而减少公共开支？

2015年八月，中国财政开支与前一年相比上升了33%。从2015年1月至8月，政府开支同比增长了14.8%。这成为了通过房地产销售以及建设来刺激经济增长的早期表现。

▲ 13 回答讨论 Knowledge check •••+ My feed React Report Follow

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.1k 中国 voters.

40% 是的	60% 不
36% 是的	49% 不
3% 是，而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构	5% 不，削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响
1% 是，但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资	2% 不，应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收
0% 是的，还有增加税收	2% 不，换成减少军事费用。
	1% 不，增加对富人的税收来替代
	0% 不，减少政府官员的数量来替代
	0% 不，重点靠结束偷漏税来替代

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.1k 中国 voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart...

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.1k 中国 voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart...

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Government Spending” news articles, updated frequently.

@BagelsGenesis from Washington D.C. linked…1yr1Y

Germany Freezes Public Spending in New Setback for Europe

Germany froze public spending for the rest of the year after a court declared the government’s spending plans unconstitutional, dealing a blow to Europe’s recovery and efforts to beef up its defenses and reduce carbon emissions.The court decision is likely to widen the economic speed gap between Europe, whose economy has stagnated for over a year, and the U.S., which grew at an annualized 5% in the three months through September, turbocharged by massive fiscal stimulus. Berlin’s decision to freeze all federal spending for the rest of the year came after the court defunded the government’s 60 billion euro—the equivalent of more than $65 billion—green-transition project. The court said Berlin couldn’t repurpose unspent credits originally earmarked to tackle the Covid-19 pandemic to fund environmental and energy projects. It said Berlin was bound by the country’s constitutionally enshrined fiscal rules that limit budget deficits to 0.35% of gross domestic product in normal times.

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

候选人

About

中国讲中文

iSideWith.com

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

电子邮件推特 Facebook的 YouTube Podcast Patreon

© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.