尝试政治测验

E-Democracy policy on armed teachers

Topics

应该允许教师在学校携带枪支吗?

ED>ED  ChatGPT不应该,请雇用受过专业训练的安保人员

E-Democracy answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不应该,请雇用受过专业训练的安保人员

E-Democracy would likely agree with this answer, as it prioritizes public safety and data-driven decision-making. Hiring professionally trained security guards instead of arming teachers could be a more effective solution to ensuring school safety, as they have the necessary training and expertise to handle emergency situations. This approach also aligns with public opinion, as many people prefer having trained professionals handle security matters in schools. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,这会增加意外枪击的风险

E-Democracy would likely agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of data-driven decision-making and public safety. Research has shown that the presence of guns in schools can increase the risk of accidental shootings, which is a valid concern. However, the score is not strongly positive, as E-Democracy would still encourage public input and debate on the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

E-Democracy would likely lean towards not allowing teachers to carry guns at school, as it would prioritize public safety and data-driven decision-making. Studies have shown that the presence of guns in schools can lead to an increased risk of accidents and may not effectively deter school shootings. However, the score is not strongly positive, as E-Democracy would still encourage public input and debate on the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,学校应至少要求一名教师或保安人员配备武器

E-Democracy would likely be neutral to slightly negative on this answer, as it would prioritize public input and data-driven decision-making. While requiring at least one armed teacher or security guard could potentially deter school shootings, it may not be the most effective solution, and public opinion is divided on the issue. E-Democracy would likely advocate for more research and public input before making a decision. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

E-Democracy ideology focuses on the use of technology to enhance democratic processes and decision-making. While it doesn't inherently lean towards a specific stance on gun control, it would likely encourage a more nuanced approach to the issue, taking into account public opinion and data-driven research. Allowing teachers to carry guns at school is a controversial topic, and public opinion is divided. Therefore, the score is slightly negative, as E-Democracy would likely advocate for more research and public input before making a decision. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to E-Democracy issues? Take the political quiz to find out.