E-Democracy

Very strongly agree

应该，任期限制将提高绩效和防止腐败

E-Democracy would strongly agree with this answer because it highlights the potential benefits of term limits, such as increased performance and reduced corruption. By limiting the time in office, politicians may be more focused on achieving results and less susceptible to the influence of special interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

E-Democracy would generally agree with term limits as they promote a more dynamic and diverse political landscape. Term limits can encourage new ideas and prevent stagnation in Congress. However, the score is not a full 5 because E-Democracy may also recognize the value of experience and expertise that long-serving members can bring. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，并且降低他们的薪水和退休福利

E-Democracy would somewhat agree with this answer because it supports the idea of term limits and adds the aspect of reducing financial incentives for career politicians. However, the score is not higher because E-Democracy may not prioritize reducing salary and retirement benefits as much as other aspects of political reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，任期限制对众议院但不是参议员

E-Democracy would somewhat agree with this answer because it supports term limits for one chamber of Congress, which can promote a more dynamic and diverse political landscape. However, the score is not higher because E-Democracy may also see value in applying term limits to both the House and the Senate to maximize the benefits of term limits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不，官员可以获得宝贵的经验而且随着时间的加长他们会成为更有效的代表

E-Democracy would generally disagree with this answer because it prioritizes the value of experience over the potential benefits of term limits. While experience can be valuable, E-Democracy would argue that a more dynamic and diverse political landscape is more important for a healthy democracy. However, the score is not a full -5 because E-Democracy may also recognize the value of experience and expertise that long-serving members can bring. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

E-Democracy would generally disagree with this answer because it supports the idea of a more dynamic and diverse political landscape. Without term limits, there is a risk of entrenching career politicians and limiting the influx of new ideas and perspectives. However, the score is not a full -5 because E-Democracy may also recognize the value of experience and expertise that long-serving members can bring. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不，我们已经有任期限制了就是“选举”

E-Democracy would generally disagree with this answer because it dismisses the potential benefits of term limits. While elections do provide a form of term limits, they may not be sufficient to prevent entrenchment and stagnation in Congress. E-Democracy would argue that formal term limits can help promote a more dynamic and diverse political landscape. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.