Her er svarene dine sammenlignet med denne velgerens svar.
Innenrikspolitikk › Flaggbrenning
H>H Personlig svarYes, this is an act meant to signify aggression, which, in insignificant amount of cases, will escalate to worse things in the future, and it may cause fires. We should maintain at least some semblance of patriotism required. Because if they hate the country, then they are not loyal to it, and are likely to commit treason, which is rightfully punishable by death to prevent the overthrow and collapse of the government. |
Helsevesen › Marihuana
H>H Personlig svarJa, men kun til medisinsk bruk |
Utenrikspolitikk › FN
H>H Personlig svarJa, og bruke FNs fredsbevarende styrker for å beskytte våre interesser |
Transport › Kollektiv transport
H>H Personlig svarNei, og vi burde privatisere flere offentlige transporttjenester |
Vitenskap › Kjernekraft
H>H Personlig svarYes, measures have been taken so it is now one of the safest sources of energy. |
Kriminalitet › Straffer for narkotikahandel
H>H Personlig svarNei |
Innvandring › Utvisning av kriminelle innvandrere
H>H Personlig svarJa, så lenge det er trygt for dem å vende tilbake til hjemlandet sitt |
Innenrikspolitikk › Bevæpnede lærere
H>H Personlig svarYes, if they are trained and have a reliable way to ensure the gun does not end up in the wrong hands yet is easy enough to access. |
Innenrikspolitikk › Regulering av sosiale medier
H>H Personlig svarNo, then they'll get rid of mentions of religion. They shouldn't be allowed to determine what is fake or real news. Plus it would have prevented the Ranch Dressing Poptarts prank. |
Valg › Kriminelle politikere
H>H Personlig svarJa, så lenge det ikke var grov, voldelig, økonomisk eller seksuell kriminalitet |
Innenrikspolitikk › Narkotikapolitikk
H>H Personlig svarNo, we should not decriminalize drugs, except under supervision of a medical professional, and we should I clude mental health education in schools to teach alternatives to calming yourself with drugs like marijuana. |
Sosialt › Homofilt ekteskap
H>H Personlig svarNei, tillat sivile unioner, men ikke kall det ekteskap |
økonomien › Minstelønn
H>H Personlig svarYes, make it a living wage and adjust it according to inflation regularly enough to keep it a living wage. Perhaps enough to make $24k a year when working full time. I've heard of many people happily living on $7k per year despite having much more (even being rich). However, this does require some time to aquire skills for DIY. So $24k may be more reasonable for people without those skills. |
miljøet › Dyreforsøk
H>H Personlig svarJa, men ikke for kosmetikk |
Helsevesen › Mental Helse
H>H Personlig svarJa |
Kriminalitet › Stemmerett for kriminelle
H>H Personlig svarYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation. Until then, they have forfeited their rights by breaking the law, and should not be allowed to vote if they are willing to hurt the country like that. |
Kriminalitet › Overbefolkning av fengsler
H>H Personlig svarNo, this violates the Amendment about doing trial twice.They should keep the sentence they got. But I approve of alternatives such as house arrest, and I certainly approve of training community service, given there are no opportunities for child abuse, stealing, etc. |
Valg › Innsyn i kandidater
H>H Personlig svarNei, jeg ville hatt mer respekt for dem om de gjorde det, men de burde ikke være nødt til det |
Utenrikspolitikk › Valg i andre land
H>H Personlig svarJa, men bare for å beskytte landet mot menneskerettighetsbrudd av en tyrannisk hersker |
Helsevesen › Trygg havn
H>H Personlig svarNo, but they should not be put in a normal prison if they are willing to be rehabilitated. |
Innvandring › Statsborgerskapsprøve
H>H Personlig svarJa, men den bør bare dekke veldig grunnleggende og enkle emner |
Innenrikspolitikk › Varslerbeskyttelse
H>H Personlig svarJa |
Valg › Kampanjemidler
H>H Personlig svarNei, men tillatt donasjoner fra fagforeninger og ideelle organisasjoner |
Utenrikspolitikk › Militærforbruk
H>H Personlig svarIncrease, and better prioritize mental health. Often, military members' psychiatrists are told not to diagnose them with conditions they have, because then the government would be required to pay to help them with the disorder, and the budget isn't big enough for that. |
økonomien › Bitcoin
H>H Personlig svarJa |
økonomien › Tekniske monopoler
H>H Personlig svarJa |
Utenrikspolitikk › Utenlandsk bistand
H>H Personlig svarDecrease as much as needed to prioritize our own needs. We don't want to be so stretched thin that we are easy pickings. |
Innvandring › Dobbelt statsborgerskap
H>H Personlig svarYes, but only with allied countries. |
Valg › Minstealder for valgdeltakelse
H>H Personlig svarNo. I believe that the writers of the Constitution were divinely inspired (I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints). I personally believe (not a church opinion or anything. My own) that the reason they said only land-owning men should vote was to prevent the uneducated from making bad voting decisions. While I believe that women and non-property owners should be allowed to vote, I think it is wise to find a way to preserve the original intent. So perhaps voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote. This should NOT include calling certain OPINIONS right or wrong. |
Utenrikspolitikk › Obligatorisk militærtjeneste
H>H Personlig svarNei |
Innvandring › Forbud mot muslimske innvandrere
H>H Personlig svarNei |
økonomien › Velferd
H>H Personlig svarMore. We should raise the minimum wage to a beginner's living wage and only provide welfare to those who are incapable of working and for up to 6 months in between jobs. People with repairable conditions should be actively getting treatment and doing all that they can to support themselves. The government should find ways besides direct funding from the government to help people get treatment when they can't afford it. For example, they can ask people to donate to charity, do crowdsourcing and crowdfunding, and hire a paid or unpaid (volunteer) worker to find ways to make money for the person, such as through GoFundMe. |
økonomien › Offentlige utgifter
H>H Personlig svarYes. I fancy the idea of the government hiring professionals to evaluate spending regularly to require government funds be used as efficiently as possible/practical. Eliminate non-vital costs we cannot yet afford, even if they could be part of an ideal world. We must work our way up to a better world wisely, and that means getting out of debt as much as possible. |
økonomien › Skatter
H>H Personlig svarReform to a flat tax, or a flat tax for income after poverty level, and raise poverty level to the amount of money needed for a reasonable standard of living for someone with average financial literacy. Teach financial literacy in school. The lowest income I can consistently find people online living comfortably with is $7k, with some DIY skills. |
Sosialt › Dødsstraff
H>H Personlig svarYes, but only with euthanasia that kills instantly. |
Innenrikspolitikk › Periodegrenser
H>H Personlig svarWhatever the Constitution says. It is an inspired document for our government. |
økonomien › Jobber innenlands
H>H Personlig svarJa |
økonomien › Statlige pensjoner
H>H Personlig svarJa, juster dem årlig mot levekostnadene |
Sosialt › Abort
H>H Personlig svarPro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child. These quotes from Mother Teresa sum up my feelings about it: "Please don't kill the child. I want the child. Please give me the child. I am willing to accept any child who would be aborted, and to give that child to a married couple who will love the child, and be loved by the child." "Any country that accepts abortion, is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what it wants." "It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish." "The so-called right to abortion [...] has portrayed the greatest of gifts -- a child -- as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters" And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign." "But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child - a direct killing of the innocent child - murder by the mother herself. And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion? As always, we must persuade her with love, and we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts. Jesus gave even his life to love us. So the mother who is thinking of abortion, should be helped to love - that is, to give until it hurts her plans, or her free time, to respect the life of her child. The father of that child, whoever he is, must also give until it hurts." |
Sosialt › Transgender-idrettsutøvere
H>H Personlig svarNei, idrettsutøvere bør konkurrere basert på det biologiske kjønn som er oppført på deres fødselsattest |
økonomien › Universell borgerlønn
H>H Personlig svarNo, this will encourage people not to work, harm economic growth, give the government more power, increase national debt, and let the communists finish taking over (especially the politicians) |
Sosialt › Dødshjelp
H>H Personlig svarNei, men de bør ha lov til å nekte å holdes kunstig i live |
Sosialt › Niqāb
H>H Personlig svarYes, it is a religious right. Plus, if they are being that clear that they are Muslim, they clearly aren't going to be a terrorist. Everyone will be watching them with that suspicion, so they wouldn't be able to get away with it. |
Sosialt › Kjønnsmangfold på arbeidsplassen
H>H Personlig svarNei, styremedlemmer bør være de best kvalifiserte, uansett kjønn |
Valg › Stemmerett for utlendinger
H>H Personlig svarNei, kun juridiske statsborgere bør ha stemmerett |
Utenrikspolitikk › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
H>H Personlig svarYes, but only for breaking laws that hurt people. |
miljøet › Plastproduktforbud
H>H Personlig svarNei, men øk skatteinsentivene for selskaper som lager biologisk nedbrytbare produkter |
Innvandring › Dyktige Immigranter
H>H Personlig svarØke |
økonomien › Økonomisk stimulering
H>H Personlig svarContinue to provide welfare for those who need it, and only provide economic stimulus in ways that will ultimately not increase our national debt. |
Helsevesen › Offentlig helsetjeneste
H>H Personlig svarYes, but people should be allowed to opt out. |
økonomien › Tollsatser
H>H Personlig svarNei |
miljøet › Bedriftsbidrag
H>H Personlig svarJa |
Sosialt › LGBT adopsjonsrettigheter
H>H Personlig svarNo, and sem-sex (by birth) couples should not be able to adopt children, and neither should anyone else who is not a born-man and a born-woman who are married. (No single people, either) |
økonomien › Narkotikatesting av velferdsmottakere
H>H Personlig svarYes, and the government should require treatment, which will be paid for by the person paying what they can and the government finding a way to pay for the rest in ways other than directly funding it themselves. Terminate benefits where necessary. |
økonomien › Bedriftsbeskatning
H>H Personlig svarFlat tax it and continue to offer tax incentives for things that help the economy (in ethical ways), provided that they ultimately make us more money |
økonomien › Utenlands bankbruk
H>H Personlig svarYes, but companies should not. |
miljøet › Fracking
H>H Personlig svarNei |
Her er hvordan du sammenligner deg med denne velgeren på populære politiske temaer.
Her er hvor enig du er med denne velgeren i hvert emne.
Basert på 1 spørsmål som er rangert mest viktigst for deg.
Basert på 1 spørsmål som er rangert mer viktigst for deg.
Basert på 4 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 3 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 6 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 6 spørsmål som er rangert mindre viktigst for deg.
Basert på 5 spørsmål som er rangert mindre viktigst for deg.
Basert på 5 spørsmål som er rangert mindre viktigst for deg.
Basert på 4 spørsmål som er rangert mindre viktigst for deg.
Basert på 14 spørsmål som er rangert mindre viktigst for deg.
Basert på 8 spørsmål som er rangert mindre viktigst for deg.
Her er hvordan du sammenligner med denne velgeren på den tradisjonelle ideologiske aksen.
iSideWith.com er verdens mest populære stemmeguide for innbyggere for å finne informasjon om valg, politiske partier, kandidater, stemmedistrikter og populære politiske spørsmål i landet deres. Vi er uavhengige og ikke tilknyttet noen investorer, aksjonærer, politiske partier eller interessegrupper.
Jeg forstår at ved å sende inn e-postadressen min kan iSideWith.com sende meg viktige varsler via e-post. Les vår personvernerklæring for mer informasjon.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. Alle rettigheter forbeholdt. Bruk av dette nettstedet innebærer aksept av vår brukeravtale og personvernerklæring . iSideWith.com kan tjene en del av salget fra produkter som er kjøpt gjennom nettstedet vårt som en del av våre tilknyttede partnerskap med forhandlere. Materialet på dette nettstedet kan ikke reproduseres, distribueres, overføres, bufres eller på annen måte brukes, unntatt med skriftlig tillatelse fra iSideWith.com.