Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
移民 › 遣送移民罪犯出境
M>M Personal answerAllow them the choice to serve out their sentence either here or elsewhere. |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
M>M Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
经济 › 最低工资
M>M Personal answerWe should start providing a decent universal basic income, enough to live comfortably with no additional income, after which minimum wage laws will be unnecessary. |
环境 › Animal Testing
M>M Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 精神健康
M>M Personal answerThis is one of those relative questions that cannot reasonably be answered if you want to compare your stances with parties from multiple countries. I’m sure some countries have adequate mental health funding while others do not. |
医保 › 安全港
M>M Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
移民 › 公民考试
M>M Personal answerNo, I am in general in favor of open borders. Also, citizenship tests very often turn out to contain bizarre and unnecessary questions. |
外交政策 › 军费支出
M>M Personal answerIn the interest of making my answers relevant to lots of different countries, I cannot reasonably answer this question, as an informed answer could easily be different depending on the country being asked about. Separately though, I don’t know enough about military spending levels to have an informed answer for this regardless. |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
M>M Personal answerThere should be laws against monopolies, and also high taxes on corporations. That’s probably all that’s needed to solve these problems. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
M>M Personal answerNo, because I don’t believe such a policy can successfully avoid also unfairly restricting those who wish to leave that religion. |
经济 › 社会福利
M>M Personal answerFewer, there should be no restrictions at all (this is called a UBI) |
经济 › 税
M>M Personal answerYes, at time of writing I am fairly sure every country should raise taxes on the rich (of course, if I wasn’t fairly sure of that, this question would be impossible to reasonably answer given that I want my answers to make sense across different countries, since as far as I can tell this same question is being used for every country with the country name dynamically substituted, rather than using individual questions per country [for purposes of ongoingly testing this: I entered this answer on the France question]) |
国内政策 › 任期限制
M>M Personal answer不,我们已经有任期限制了就是“选举” |
经济 › 政府养老金
M>M Personal answerCreate a universal basic income, after which the concept of pensions becomes redundant |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
M>M Personal answerYes, as long as they have been reasonably assessed to not have an unfair advantage due to being transgender |
社会 › 安乐死
M>M Personal answerDeath is bad. Encourage cryonic suspension instead. |
移民 › 技术移民
M>M Personal answerIncrease (but it would be better to just get rid of this restriction completely) |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
M>M Personal answerNo, because very unfortunately the replacements are not good enough yet. |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
M>M Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
M>M Personal answerNo, there should be no restrictions on welfare at all |
经济 › 公司税
M>M Personal answerRaise. I’m pretty sure every country ought to raise taxes on corporations (of course, if I wasn’t sure of that I wouldn’t be able to reasonably answer this question) |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.